Reviews - General Information
I am also always on the lookout for books that can be used in teaching philosophy, that attempt to demystify a certain text or topic, or that deal with serious philosophical subjects in a non-pretentious way. Just to clarify, I'm not looking for books which attempt to 'dumb down' philosophy; philosophy is hard, and often it just isn't possible to make an idea any simpler. However, frequently philosophers are guilty of writing for the select few (i.e. other philosophers), and use jargon and terminology which can be off-putting and confusing for the layman or student. So, if you are a publisher or author, and think that your book would be useful for the sort of reader that this site is aimed at, then you are welcome to send me a copy for review (please contact me to arrange delivery).
As regards the reviews themselves, I do not aim at a hatchet-job, but focus rather on the merits of each book for different purposes. This doesn't mean that I will never say anything negative about a book, but merely that my primary aim is to highlight what is useful and interesting. For this, I have devised the LAUD system (which I also use in the recommended reading section of my own books). This is a very simple and rough way of categorising each book according to the type of readership that it will appeal to:
- L = Layperson - This book will appeal to those with no specific knowledge of philosophy (this does not mean that it is 'easy', or 'for dummies', but merely that you don't need to have studied philosophy to find it interesting or enjoyable).
- A = A-level student (UK)/Freshman (US) - This book will be useful for those studying philosophy. It assumes that you will want a certain level of detail and coverage of the subject, and that you are not just reading it for pleasure. However, it is still an introductory text.
- U = Undergraduate - Generally, a book of this type will provide more detail and be more challenging than a beginner's guide. So, it will either assume some previous knowledge, or else treat the subject in a way that will be useful for more in-depth study. As such, it will be most suitable for those who have aleady read an introductory text, are fairly familiar with the general nature of the subject, and are looking to develop their understanding further.
- D = Detailed study at degree level. Books of this type are generally quite hard, and - because of their level of detail and depth of argument - are not suitable for beginners or as introductions to the subject. However, they may still be useful for those who have become familiar with the topic in question, and wish to delve deeper (perhaps in search of advanced criticism or clarification of difficult points).
Obviously, the above system is only a rule of thumb, and I do not always stick to it religiously. For instance, if I think a particular accessible book is important or very interesting, then I will simply recommend it for everyone (LAUD). Also, I may occasionally recommend a quite challenging book to the layperson (L) if I think that the ideas are generally interesting and are presented in a no-nonsense way. Sometimes, I will review a non-academic book that I think is generally important, or, whilst aimed at a non-philosophical readership, highlights some important philosophical issues. In such cases I do not use the LAUD rating, which is no reflection on the merits of the book, but merely a sign that it is aimed primarily at the general reader.
Finally, a word about turnaround. If you do send me a book for review, I will do everything I can to respond as quickly as I can. However, please bear in mind that I have other books to review, as well as other duties and commitments. You can check on my to-review list HERE.
Share this Page
Click on one of the icons below to share this page using any of the listed sharing sites (it inserts the link for you, so you don't need to add it manually). Let me know if any sharing sites you commonly use aren't here, and I will add them.
