| |
We
now come to the final theory of perception, that of Phenomenalism.
Like Idealism, Phenomenalism argues that our knowledge about the
world comes through our senses. Furthermore, it also shifts knowledge
about the world away from any talk of "the object itself"
and replaces it with our experiences of it.
This
is a little bit more difficult to grasp than the previous theories,
mainly because it is a theory of truth and not just an account of
perception. We shall look at definitions of truth, knowledge and
belief in the next unit, so we shall only touch upon this theory
here.
Statements
about the World
The
Phenomenalist view argues that when we talk about a thing - such
as a tree - we are actually talking about our perceptions of it.
So, instead of saying, "The leaves on the tree are green,"
I say, "I have a perception of a tree with green leaves."
This might seem to be a trifling difference, but notice that by
doing so we are not saying anything about the tree, only our perception
of it.
In
this way, by talking only about our perception and experience of
things, we are not led into saying things that cannot be backed
by the evidence of our senses.
Exercise
Which
of the following statements would a phenomenalist say could be backed
up by experience?
|
Statement
|
Backed
up by Experience?
|
Reason
|
| I
see a tree with green leaves |
|
You
see the leaves, so the statement is backed up by experience.
|
| All
swans are white |
|
No
matter how many times you saw white swans, this could not
guarantee that they were all white (the problem of
induction).
|
| 2
+ 2 = 4 |
|
Although
you might say that experience teaches us this, you really
need it to be true before you apply it. Therefore,
Ayer creates a separate category for this sort of a priori
truth.
|
| Maths
is beautiful |
|
Whilst
beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, it is not really
visible in the same way as, say, the colour red.
|
| Shakespeare
is a great writer |
|
We
could maybe verify that a lot of people think so,
but this is not the same as proving the statement itself.
|
How
did you do? Click here
to see my answers.
Sense
and Nonsense
What
do you think? Can all of these statements be backed up by experience?
If not, what status do they then have? Phenomenalists, such as the
20th century English philosopher A. J. Ayer, thought that they were
literally non-sensical. We shall look at this view in more detail
in the next unit.
|
|