|
|
| |
The Argument
from dreaming
|
|
| |
Most
of what we have covered so far has dealt with the untrustworthiness
of the senses. However, certain philosophers have taken the problem
a stage further by asking the question, "Is it possible to
tell reality from a dream?"
|
|
|
The basis
for this question is simple: when we dream we often believe that
what we are experiencing is real. So, how can we be sure that what
we are now experiencing is not a dream of some sort?
The 17th
century French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) most
famously asked this question in his Meditations on the First
Philosophy . However, the idea itself is not a new one. Many
cultures contain stories and belief systems that portray life as
a dream. Hinduism, most notably, considers all material existence
to be illusory, or "maya", from which we "wake up"
when we realise the true reality. Descartes had a similar agenda,
though his intention was to establish beyond doubt that we are not
deceived in any way - which dreaming would be an example of.
The argument
itself is not so easy to refute as you would think. To someone who
replies that the argument can be easily refuted by the simple fact
that we wake up, it can be pointed out that there are occasions
when people seem to have dreamed of doing that. This involves us
in what is called an "infinite regress": anything which
is mentioned as being an aspect of reality (as opposed to a dream)
is said to be part of the content of the dream itself. So, I may
dream that I think I am awake; I may dream that I can tell waking
from dreaming; and so on.
|
 |
|
Descartes'
answer to this problem is to try to guarantee knowledge through
appeals to God and rational necessity (we shall look at this in
more detail later in the course). However, other philosophers have
put forward arguments based upon the idea that dreaming and waking
up are concepts that are tied together (you cannot have one without
the other).
|
| eXistenZ
The idea of never waking up has been used by writers and film makers
a number of times. Jacob's Ladder (1990) provides an original
twist to this sort of story, and the 1999 film by David Cronenberg,
called eXistenZ, uses the modern day equivalent of virtual
reality games, with the tag line, "Where does reality stop...
and the game begin?"
Exercise
In Shakespeare's
Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark says:
O God,
I could be bounded in a nut shell and count
myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I
have bad dreams.
(II. ii. 254-6)
|
| |
Here
the idea seems to be that dreams provide some sort of link to -
or proof of - the existence of the outside world. Consider to what
extent this may be true. Is it possible that you are dreaming right
now? What arguments might be used against someone who thought that
life is a dream or illusion? As you consider these issues, make
a list of arguments for the argument (life may be a dream)
and against it (dreams and reality are different and easily distinguished).
Which side wins?
|
|
| |
Try and
make it like a real argument where the points follow on from one another.
For Example:
|
For
|
Against
|
| Dreams seem real
when we are dreaming |
When compared to
real life, dreams seem fragmented |
| Real life is sometimes
fragmented and strange |
But not always |
Once you have done this, move on to the next section.
Next
>>
|
|
|